Sunday 16 October 2016

Letter to the editor

It is quite perplexing to observe such a peculiar reaction and distain towards and of the next generation and their form of communication. Whether it is perceived as a valid form of proper or standard English it should not be discriminated against by employers, who for a fact primer their target audience to the next generation who have been raised with this form of speech. As John McWhorter pointed out during a TedTalk on textspcak as far back as 63 AD people were complaining about the change in language used by the next generation and spat at it as if it were the devil’s work. A similar animosity can be seen by many people of older generations in today’s society, especially when it comes to interviewers and hiring executives as can be seen in the article, “Young Job Candidates Find Too-Casual Tone of Textspeak Turns Off Hiring Managers” by Sarah E. Needleman.

In many segments of this article you can see hiring managers seemingly putting themselves in the direct cross hair of textspeack and appearing shocked and dumbfounded that they are bombarded by it every single time. It is almost comparable to an amnesiac touching a hot pot over and over again not remember the previous time. Such an example would be, “her cell number is on her business card, which she gave to the candidate… ‘It's infringing a bit on your personal space,’ … the candidate wasn't hired partly for this reason.” She being Cathy Chin a hiring manager should have know that she had put her personal number on a card that she gave to hundreds that she would be contacted on that number. The tower or spire of superiority and dominance that many of these hiring agents can appear to show a disconnect almost as if they view the interviewees as being surfs in there kingdom, if they talk in properly and not in the queens English they are executed to brushed away. Is that kind of hatred and disrespect for the upcoming generation what you really want in a hiring agent who determines your child’s future?
Evidentially the more “casual” language is actually where are world as a whole is heading and has been heading ever since the creation of language, the easier speech and communication is the more efficient and productive a society and be as a whole. Would you not agree?



2 comments:

  1. I really liked the way you referred to the ted talk by John McWhorter, as this is very relevant to the issue the writer is approaching in their eyes, even though it is not an issue in most scenarios as you stated in your response. I completely agree with the points you have brought up in your response.. Well done

    ReplyDelete