Fate, a word that often carries a variety of meaning depending
on the mindset of the thinker. In the case of Naguib Mahfouz’s The Thief and
the Dogs is very uncertain as he often presents the abstract concept of fate is
present by the use of context to depict and justify action and events. In
regards to some of the main events like Said’s death. Because of his actions he
was inevitably going to end in death, he knew deep down that there was no
possible way to avoid punishment and he would eventually end in death as he
wouldn’t be able to return to prison.
Mahfouz uses a unique concept of free will governed by fate,
by this I mean the path seems clear as Said commits to crime but within the
story Said feels as if he has no choice. When he does have the possibility of
changing his goal in life with a shift from vengeance to spiritual enlightenment,
he rejects it as he as an overwhelming urge to seek a conclusion to his past
life, so much that he purposefully seeks out further aggressive acts. Mahfouz distinctly
shows through the intentions of the characters their fate is sealed Rauf’s goal
within the story is to further his wealth and estate. In response Rauf’s Fate
is to be in direct conflict with Said no matter what choice he makes the
intention polarizes his fate leaving him in constant danger.
Fate an idea presented in Mahfouz’s novel meaning a character’s
action reflect their intention and the intention is what indicates and cements
the fate which they will have. No matter the character they all have a path
which is set for them while different options and possibilities even if they
are taken unless the character has the intention for committing to it they will
inevitably come back to the fate they were sealed to.
No comments:
Post a Comment